[Gt-eos] gct and gsissh

[Mischa Salle]

Hi Paul,

but in this case, we (gct) now are upstream, unless you mean openssh
itself? In the latter case, I wouldn't bother to get it pushed
through...

    Cheers,
    Mischa

On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 12:33:34PM +0100, Paul Millar wrote:
> Hi Jim,
> 
> On 27/11/17 16:40, Basney, Jim wrote:
> > What’s our gct plan for gsissh?
> [...]
> > What does everyone think? Anyone want to argue for inclusion of HPN
> > and/or iSSHD in gct?
> 
> My suggestion (2c's worth) is to accept them for now, but have an "escape
> plan". Push the patches (whatever they take) upstream and throw away
> everything else.  This plan could have a specific deadline, if that would be
> helpful.
> 
> The rational is that, if there's a sufficient use base that depends on a
> particular feature / enhancement then this should provide some motivation
> for the upstream team to accept the enhancements.  Of course this might
> require some tinkering with the patches to get them accepted.
> 
> However, I'm not directly or indirectly affected by this (and my suggestion
> would involve more work for others) so feel free to just drop the features.
> 
> HTH,
> 
> Paul.
> _______________________________________________
> Gt-eos mailing list
> Gt-eos at mailman.egi.eu
> http://mailman.egi.eu/mailman/listinfo/gt-eos

-- 
Nikhef                      Room  H155
Science Park 105            Tel.  +31-20-592 5102
1098 XG Amsterdam           Fax   +31-20-592 5155
The Netherlands             Email msalle at nikhef.nl
  __ .. ... _._. .... ._  ... ._ ._.. ._.. .._..
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3402 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.egi.eu/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20171128/d395138a/attachment.p7s>