[Gt-eos] ready to tag

Fri Nov 2 15:31:48 CET 2018

Mattias,

Thanks for pinging this thread. I vote 6.2.

- Brian

On 11/2/18 8:07 AM, Frank Scheiner via Gt-eos wrote:
Hi Mattias, all,

On 11/2/18 12:50, Mattias Ellert via Gt-eos wrote:
Hi!

Can we come to some kind of decision? I would like to package the
changes made to the sources since the last tag, and the way it is set
up now source tarballs are not created unless there is a tag. If it
drags out for a long time I could make package updates using patches,
but I think we can avoid that.

Regarding the toolkit version number: It should be 6.something -
otherwise the https://repo.gridcf.org/gct6/sources/ address no longer
makes sense and we would have to do quite a lot of changes.

The number 6.0 appears in a few places in the packaging files, so if we
stick to that no changes are needed. If we choose 6.1 or 6.2, a few
changes are needed, but it would be manageable (those changes should be
done before tagging though).

I'm ok with both 6.0 and 6.2. But my preference would be 6.2 actually, although we could still postpone 6.2 until after end of 2018 and stay with 6.0 for now.

So your decision.

Cheers,
Frank

    Mattias

mån 2018-10-22 klockan 10:12 -0500 skrev Mátyás Selmeci via Gt-eos:
Hi Mischa and folks,

I _really_ do not want to go backwards in versions.  I'm sure people
have scripts that check for $GLOBUS_VERSION and do one thing if it's
= 6.0 and another if it's < 6.0.  I don't want to mess up those scripts.

We don't have to worry about conflicting with a Globus 6.1 or 6.2
release because:

1. We've been updating our repo to keep up with their repo.  If they
make a 6.2, then our 6.2 will incorporate their changes.

2. They've been on 6.0 since _2014_.  They haven't bumped the version
even when they added features.  Now they're in bugfix-only mode so
they won't be adding features either.

3. We can ask the Globus developers if they're OK with us calling our
version 6.2.

Thanks,
-Mat

-------- Original Message --------
From: Mischa Salle
Sent: Sun, Oct 21, 2018 4:04 AM CDT
Subject: [Gt-eos] ready to tag

Hi all,

We have a few options each with pros and cons:
- 6.1 is logical, but used to indicate development version (see
   http://toolkit.globus.org/toolkit/downloads/
   We don't have to keep to that schema (Linux kernel also dropped it),
   but it could be confusing.
- 6.2 is then more logical, but both still have the problem that there
   is indeed a small chance that Globus will still release something, a
   final release or so (although I very much doubt that). OTOH, we're
   called gct, not globus_toolkit, so I personally think 6.something
   should be fine.
- 1.0 has none of the above problems, we can also decide then to
   continue with 1.1 as the next stable (minor)release. Problem is that
   we have already a gct-6.0.1536386276 as a prerelease.
Ideally I think Globus shouldn't have been using 6.0.XXXX as a
prerelease but something like 6.0.0-XXXX, which works better with a sort
and is consistent with typical debian and rpm numbering.

I think I personally would prefer to move to a gct-1.0.0 combined from
now on with 1.0.0-$(date +%s) for the development releases.

Cheers,
Mischa

On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 06:13:16PM +0200, End of Support of Globus
Toolkit wrote:
Hi all,

Now that Mattias has made EPEL and Debian packages from the current
builds, I think we're finally ready to tag a release. Does anybody have
an objection to the version 6.0.1? I'd like to keep the "6.0" for now to
emphasize that we're still compatible with that version of the Globus
Toolkit.

Will there be a Globus 6.1 or 7.0 at some point, that some of our customers
could be exposed to?  If so, it would lead to confusion sooner or later.

Should we better start our releases with 1.0.0 instead and mention desired
compatibility details in the release notes?

On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 11:34:27AM -0500, End of Support of Globus
Toolkit wrote:
Sorry, looks like we might not be able to use 6.0.1 because the "micro"
version number is actually the timestamp of the latest commit, which
gets added to the version of the "gct" tarball.

The version "6.0" gets embedded in several places in the code, most
notably as the GLOBUS_VERSION environment variable and the script
"/usr/bin/globus-version", so we'll have to try out 6.1 first to make
sure it doesn't cause any problems.

-Mat

-------- Original Message --------
From: Mátyás Selmeci
Sent: Fri, Oct 19, 2018 10:53 AM CDT
Subject: ready to tag

Hi all,

Now that Mattias has made EPEL and Debian packages from the current
builds, I think we're finally ready to tag a release. Does anybody have
an objection to the version 6.0.1? I'd like to keep the "6.0" for now to
emphasize that we're still compatible with that version of the Globus
Toolkit.

Thanks,
-Mat

_______________________________________________
Gt-eos mailing list
Gt-eos at mailman.egi.eu<mailto:Gt-eos at mailman.egi.eu>
http://mailman.egi.eu/mailman/listinfo/gt-eos

_______________________________________________
Gt-eos mailing list
Gt-eos at mailman.egi.eu<mailto:Gt-eos at mailman.egi.eu>
http://mailman.egi.eu/mailman/listinfo/gt-eos

_______________________________________________
Gt-eos mailing list
Gt-eos at mailman.egi.eu<mailto:Gt-eos at mailman.egi.eu>
http://mailman.egi.eu/mailman/listinfo/gt-eos

_______________________________________________
Gt-eos mailing list
Gt-eos at mailman.egi.eu<mailto:Gt-eos at mailman.egi.eu>
http://mailman.egi.eu/mailman/listinfo/gt-eos

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.egi.eu/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20181102/9f2d7d99/attachment.html>