[Discuss] Regarding gridcf/gct-documention

[Brian Lin]

Frank,

Sure, "gt-docs-archived" works but now I'm a little confused about the 
differences between the 'gct-docs' and 'gct-documentation' repositories. 
Could you refresh my memory on why we have the two different repos?

Thanks,
Brian

On 7/25/19 10:21 AM, Frank Scheiner wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
> On 7/25/19 17:01, Brian Lin wrote:
>> Hi Frank,
>>
>> I'm on board with both renaming the repo (but would suggest something
>> clearer like gct-docs-archived
>
> Well, it doesn't contain any GCT related info yet, so 
> "gct-docs-archived" could be a little misleading - or did you mean to 
> write "gt-docs-archived"?
>
> Cheers,
> Frank
>
>> ) and marking it as an archive in GitHub.
>> Before we do the latter, I suggest that we add something to the top of
>> the README.md to point to the new docs repo.
>>
>> - Brian
>>
>> On 7/25/19 4:52 AM, Frank Scheiner wrote:
>>> Hi Brian, Mátyás, Mattias, Mischa,
>>>
>>> say, do we still need the gridcf/gct-documention repo at [1]?
>>>
>>> [1]: https://github.com/gridcf/gct-documentation
>>>
>>> I find it a little irritating to have two similarly named repos in the
>>> gridcf project namespace.
>>>
>>> If this is meant to have a copy of the Globus Toolkit documentation
>>> before our changes just in case it vanishes sometime in the future,
>>> wouldn't it be better to (1) rename it to "gt-documentation" and (2)
>>> to make it r/o and archive it?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Frank
>>>
>>
>