[Discuss] Regarding gridcf/gct-documention

[Brian Lin]

Done.

On 7/25/19 10:53 AM, Brian Lin via discuss wrote:
> Frank,
>
> Yeah, it looks like gct-documentation was never used. I'll go ahead with
> renaming it to 'gt-docs-archived', updating the README, and archiving
> the repo.
>
> - Brian
>
> On 7/25/19 10:39 AM, Frank Scheiner wrote:
>> Hi Brian,
>>
>> On 7/25/19 17:26, Brian Lin wrote:
>>> Frank,
>>>
>>> Sure, "gt-docs-archived" works but now I'm a little confused about the
>>> differences between the 'gct-docs' and 'gct-documentation' repositories.
>>> Could you refresh my memory on why we have the two different repos?
>> No idea, actually I don't even know who forked it into the gridcf
>> organization. On [2] I see that Mátyás created a fork of the very same
>> repo into his own account. Maybe he used it as basis for the gct-docs
>> repo?
>>
>> [2]: https://github.com/gridcf/gct-documentation/network/members
>>
>> UPDATE: On [3] I see you under "Collaborators" as admin, not sure what
>> this means, though. In my own fork of the GCT for example I don't see
>> any collaborators.
>>
>> [3]: https://github.com/gridcf/gct-documentation/settings/collaboration
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Frank
>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Brian
>>>
>>> On 7/25/19 10:21 AM, Frank Scheiner wrote:
>>>> Hi Brian,
>>>>
>>>> On 7/25/19 17:01, Brian Lin wrote:
>>>>> Hi Frank,
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm on board with both renaming the repo (but would suggest something
>>>>> clearer like gct-docs-archived
>>>> Well, it doesn't contain any GCT related info yet, so
>>>> "gct-docs-archived" could be a little misleading - or did you mean to
>>>> write "gt-docs-archived"?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Frank
>>>>
>>>>> ) and marking it as an archive in GitHub.
>>>>> Before we do the latter, I suggest that we add something to the top of
>>>>> the README.md to point to the new docs repo.
>>>>>
>>>>> - Brian
>>>>>
>>>>> On 7/25/19 4:52 AM, Frank Scheiner wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Brian, Mátyás, Mattias, Mischa,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> say, do we still need the gridcf/gct-documention repo at [1]?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1]: https://github.com/gridcf/gct-documentation
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I find it a little irritating to have two similarly named repos in
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> gridcf project namespace.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If this is meant to have a copy of the Globus Toolkit documentation
>>>>>> before our changes just in case it vanishes sometime in the future,
>>>>>> wouldn't it be better to (1) rename it to "gt-documentation" and (2)
>>>>>> to make it r/o and archive it?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Frank
>>>>>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> discuss mailing list
> discuss at gridcf.org
> https://mailman.egi.eu/mailman/listinfo/discuss