[Discuss] Regarding gridcf/gct-documention

[Frank Scheiner]

On 7/25/19 18:09, Brian Lin wrote:
> Done.

Thanks a lot. :-)

> 
> On 7/25/19 10:53 AM, Brian Lin via discuss wrote:
>> Frank,
>>
>> Yeah, it looks like gct-documentation was never used. I'll go ahead with
>> renaming it to 'gt-docs-archived', updating the README, and archiving
>> the repo.
>>
>> - Brian
>>
>> On 7/25/19 10:39 AM, Frank Scheiner wrote:
>>> Hi Brian,
>>>
>>> On 7/25/19 17:26, Brian Lin wrote:
>>>> Frank,
>>>>
>>>> Sure, "gt-docs-archived" works but now I'm a little confused about the
>>>> differences between the 'gct-docs' and 'gct-documentation' repositories.
>>>> Could you refresh my memory on why we have the two different repos?
>>> No idea, actually I don't even know who forked it into the gridcf
>>> organization. On [2] I see that Mátyás created a fork of the very same
>>> repo into his own account. Maybe he used it as basis for the gct-docs
>>> repo?
>>>
>>> [2]: https://github.com/gridcf/gct-documentation/network/members
>>>
>>> UPDATE: On [3] I see you under "Collaborators" as admin, not sure what
>>> this means, though. In my own fork of the GCT for example I don't see
>>> any collaborators.
>>>
>>> [3]: https://github.com/gridcf/gct-documentation/settings/collaboration
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Frank
>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Brian
>>>>
>>>> On 7/25/19 10:21 AM, Frank Scheiner wrote:
>>>>> Hi Brian,
>>>>>
>>>>> On 7/25/19 17:01, Brian Lin wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Frank,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm on board with both renaming the repo (but would suggest something
>>>>>> clearer like gct-docs-archived
>>>>> Well, it doesn't contain any GCT related info yet, so
>>>>> "gct-docs-archived" could be a little misleading - or did you mean to
>>>>> write "gt-docs-archived"?
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Frank
>>>>>
>>>>>> ) and marking it as an archive in GitHub.
>>>>>> Before we do the latter, I suggest that we add something to the top of
>>>>>> the README.md to point to the new docs repo.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - Brian
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 7/25/19 4:52 AM, Frank Scheiner wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi Brian, Mátyás, Mattias, Mischa,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> say, do we still need the gridcf/gct-documention repo at [1]?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [1]: https://github.com/gridcf/gct-documentation
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I find it a little irritating to have two similarly named repos in
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> gridcf project namespace.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If this is meant to have a copy of the Globus Toolkit documentation
>>>>>>> before our changes just in case it vanishes sometime in the future,
>>>>>>> wouldn't it be better to (1) rename it to "gt-documentation" and (2)
>>>>>>> to make it r/o and archive it?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>> Frank
>>>>>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> discuss mailing list
>> discuss at gridcf.org
>> https://mailman.egi.eu/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> 

-- 
Frank Scheiner

High Performance Computing Center Stuttgart (HLRS)
Department Project User Management & Accounting

Email: scheiner at hlrs.de
Phone: +49 711 685 68039

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2293 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mailman.egi.eu/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20190725/2ca966bc/attachment-0001.p7s>