[Discuss] Regarding gridcf/gct-documention

[Mischa Salle]

Hi all,

we had a discussion on gt-eos about this in November 2017, see the
thread starting at
https://mailman.egi.eu/pipermail/discuss/2017-November/000093.html
in particular
https://mailman.egi.eu/pipermail/discuss/2017-November/000119.html

Seems fine to me to have it now archived, thanks for doing that!

Mischa

On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 11:01:48AM -0500, Mátyás Selmeci wrote:
> Looks like gct-documentation was a fork of the whole Globus site and
> gct-docs was probably the toolkit stuff extracted from that?  There's
> a number of common commits between the two.  I'm fine with archiving
> gct-documentation.
> 
> -Mat
> 
> 
> On 07/25/19 10:39, Frank Scheiner wrote:
> > Hi Brian,
> > 
> > On 7/25/19 17:26, Brian Lin wrote:
> >> Frank,
> >>
> >> Sure, "gt-docs-archived" works but now I'm a little confused about the
> >> differences between the 'gct-docs' and 'gct-documentation' repositories.
> >> Could you refresh my memory on why we have the two different repos?
> > 
> > No idea, actually I don't even know who forked it into the gridcf organization. On [2] I see that Mátyás created a fork of the very same repo into his own account. Maybe he used it as basis for the gct-docs repo?
> > 
> > [2]: https://github.com/gridcf/gct-documentation/network/members
> > 
> > UPDATE: On [3] I see you under "Collaborators" as admin, not sure what this means, though. In my own fork of the GCT for example I don't see any collaborators.
> > 
> > [3]: https://github.com/gridcf/gct-documentation/settings/collaboration
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > Frank
> > 
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Brian
> >>
> >> On 7/25/19 10:21 AM, Frank Scheiner wrote:
> >>> Hi Brian,
> >>>
> >>> On 7/25/19 17:01, Brian Lin wrote:
> >>>> Hi Frank,
> >>>>
> >>>> I'm on board with both renaming the repo (but would suggest something
> >>>> clearer like gct-docs-archived
> >>>
> >>> Well, it doesn't contain any GCT related info yet, so
> >>> "gct-docs-archived" could be a little misleading - or did you mean to
> >>> write "gt-docs-archived"?
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>> Frank
> >>>
> >>>> ) and marking it as an archive in GitHub.
> >>>> Before we do the latter, I suggest that we add something to the top of
> >>>> the README.md to point to the new docs repo.
> >>>>
> >>>> - Brian
> >>>>
> >>>> On 7/25/19 4:52 AM, Frank Scheiner wrote:
> >>>>> Hi Brian, Mátyás, Mattias, Mischa,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> say, do we still need the gridcf/gct-documention repo at [1]?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [1]: https://github.com/gridcf/gct-documentation
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I find it a little irritating to have two similarly named repos in the
> >>>>> gridcf project namespace.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> If this is meant to have a copy of the Globus Toolkit documentation
> >>>>> before our changes just in case it vanishes sometime in the future,
> >>>>> wouldn't it be better to (1) rename it to "gt-documentation" and (2)
> >>>>> to make it r/o and archive it?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Cheers,
> >>>>> Frank
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> > 

-- 
Nikhef                      Room  H155
Science Park 105            Tel.  +31-20-592 5102
1098 XG Amsterdam           Fax   +31-20-592 5155
The Netherlands             Email msalle at nikhef.nl
  __ .. ... _._. .... ._  ... ._ ._.. ._.. .._..
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 4521 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.egi.eu/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20190726/ee801243/attachment.p7s>