[Discuss] Regarding gridcf/gct-documention

[Mátyás Selmeci]

Thanks!  I renamed and archived my fork as well.

-Mat

On 07/26/19 04:33, Mischa Salle wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> we had a discussion on gt-eos about this in November 2017, see the
> thread starting at
> https://mailman.egi.eu/pipermail/discuss/2017-November/000093.html
> in particular
> https://mailman.egi.eu/pipermail/discuss/2017-November/000119.html
> 
> Seems fine to me to have it now archived, thanks for doing that!
> 
> Mischa
> 
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 11:01:48AM -0500, Mátyás Selmeci wrote:
>> Looks like gct-documentation was a fork of the whole Globus site and
>> gct-docs was probably the toolkit stuff extracted from that?  There's
>> a number of common commits between the two.  I'm fine with archiving
>> gct-documentation.
>>
>> -Mat
>>
>>
>> On 07/25/19 10:39, Frank Scheiner wrote:
>>> Hi Brian,
>>>
>>> On 7/25/19 17:26, Brian Lin wrote:
>>>> Frank,
>>>>
>>>> Sure, "gt-docs-archived" works but now I'm a little confused about the
>>>> differences between the 'gct-docs' and 'gct-documentation' repositories.
>>>> Could you refresh my memory on why we have the two different repos?
>>>
>>> No idea, actually I don't even know who forked it into the gridcf organization. On [2] I see that Mátyás created a fork of the very same repo into his own account. Maybe he used it as basis for the gct-docs repo?
>>>
>>> [2]: https://github.com/gridcf/gct-documentation/network/members
>>>
>>> UPDATE: On [3] I see you under "Collaborators" as admin, not sure what this means, though. In my own fork of the GCT for example I don't see any collaborators.
>>>
>>> [3]: https://github.com/gridcf/gct-documentation/settings/collaboration
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Frank
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Brian
>>>>
>>>> On 7/25/19 10:21 AM, Frank Scheiner wrote:
>>>>> Hi Brian,
>>>>>
>>>>> On 7/25/19 17:01, Brian Lin wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Frank,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm on board with both renaming the repo (but would suggest something
>>>>>> clearer like gct-docs-archived
>>>>>
>>>>> Well, it doesn't contain any GCT related info yet, so
>>>>> "gct-docs-archived" could be a little misleading - or did you mean to
>>>>> write "gt-docs-archived"?
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Frank
>>>>>
>>>>>> ) and marking it as an archive in GitHub.
>>>>>> Before we do the latter, I suggest that we add something to the top of
>>>>>> the README.md to point to the new docs repo.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - Brian
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 7/25/19 4:52 AM, Frank Scheiner wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi Brian, Mátyás, Mattias, Mischa,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> say, do we still need the gridcf/gct-documention repo at [1]?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [1]: https://github.com/gridcf/gct-documentation
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I find it a little irritating to have two similarly named repos in the
>>>>>>> gridcf project namespace.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If this is meant to have a copy of the Globus Toolkit documentation
>>>>>>> before our changes just in case it vanishes sometime in the future,
>>>>>>> wouldn't it be better to (1) rename it to "gt-documentation" and (2)
>>>>>>> to make it r/o and archive it?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>> Frank
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>